SQUARE-ACI International Conference on Biotechnology in Health and Agriculture 2017

December 29 - 30, 2017 | Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract acceptance notification 

SQUARE-ACI ICBHA 2017 conference scientific committee is pleased to announce the abstract review results. Please the decision on your abstract below (or you can download it from here). To find your abstract, look for your registration number. Please be careful about the following points;
 
1) Those who are elected for short oral presentation, please let us know if you want to withdraw from oral to poster. The deadline is 9th December 2017. After that no changes will be allowed
 
2) The reviewers suggested some revision for some abstracts. Please correct the abstracts and send the revised version to asadulghani@igmail.com and gnobb.org@gmail.com. The dead line for revised abstract submission is December 10, 2017. Please remember the deadline will be strictly followed.
 
3) If anyone would like to withdraw abstract, please let us know by December 10, 2017.
 
4) Respective sessions are indicated in the excel sheet. To get an idea about the sessions, please see the program in SQUARE ICBHA 2017 conference web page
 
5) The instructions for oral and poster presentations will be updated in the web page by December 12, 2017. Please keep an eye on that.

 

Abstract-ID

Reg-ID

Ssession

FINAL SELECTION

major_revision?

comment (if any)

37

130

S1

Oral

no

 

48

122

S1

Oral

no

 

22

68

S3

Oral

no

 

1

69

S3

Oral

no

 

158

359

S3

Oral

no

 

75

97

S4

 Oral

no

 

68

102

S4

Oral

No

 

123

118

S4

Oral

no

 

83

277

S5

 Oral

no

 

85

285

S5

 Oral

no

 

66

112

S5

 

No

 

72

120

S6

 Oral

no

 

36

237

S6

 Oral

no

 

89

164

S6

 Oral

no

same abstract 89,90

90

272

S6

 Oral

no

same abstract 89,90

107

263

S7

Oral

no

 

128

295

S7

Oral

no

 

146

307

S7

Oral

no

 

122

181

S1

Short Oral

no

 

120

296

S1

Short Oral

no

 

87

101

s1

Short Oral

no

 

91

136

s1

Short Oral

no

 

14

93

S1

Short Oral

no

 

10

78

S1

Short Oral

no

 

162

397

S2

Short Oral

no

 

145

192

S2

Short Oral

no

 

147

355

S2

Short Oral

no

 

148

367

S2

Short Oral

no

 

118

357

S2

Short Oral

no

 

2

70

S2

Short Oral

no

 

33

48

S3

Short Oral

no

 

114

326

S3

Short Oral

no

 

135

358

S3

Short Oral

no

 

58

193

S4

Short Oral

No

 

29

227

S4

Short Oral

no

 

30

204

S4

Short Oral

no

 

46

233

S7

Short Oral

no

 

139

315

S7

Short Oral

no

 

77

316

S1

Poster

no

 

15

18

S1

Poster

no

 

35

240

S1

Poster

no

 

18

110

S1

Poster

no

 

23

165

S1

Poster

no

Minor spelling mistakes are corected but red color mark need further explanation.

25

162

S1

Poster

no

Minor spelling mistakes are corected

60

230

S1

Poster

No

Dry analysis, no report on the findings for the works on wet lab

62

217

S1

Poster

No

 

105

259

s1

Poster

no

 

106

59

S1

Poster

NO

Minor correction

141

210

S1

Poster

No

 

150

303

S1

Poster

major revision

Not clear what experiments were done!

5

47

S1

Poster

no

 

6

16

S1

Poster

no

 

7

23

S1

Poster

no

 

8

20

S1

Poster

no

 

9

81

S1

Poster

no

 

11

21

S1

Poster

no

 

12

24

S1

Poster

no

 

133

235

S1

Poster

no

 

134

363

S1

Poster

no

 

80

318

S2

Poster

no

 

42

80

S2

Poster

no

 

47

44

S2

Poster

no

minor corrections required

50

288

S2

Poster

no

minor corrections required

19

154

S2

Poster

no

informative

20

147

S2

Poster

no

Data of abstract ID 147 and ID 153 seems generated from the same project as data were presented in a similar fashion. Whether is it possible to combine in one abstract characterizing two foodborne bacteria such as SALMONELLA SPP. and CAMPYLOBACTER SPP? If they submit in one abstract then it can be presented as Oral presentation since it covers health related important issues.

21

153

S2

Poster

no

Data of abstract ID 147 and ID 153 seems generated from the same project as data were presented in a similar fashion. Whether is it possible to combine in one abstract characterizing two foodborne bacteria such as SALMONELLA SPP. and CAMPYLOBACTER SPP? If they submit in one abstract then it can be presented as Oral presentation since it covers health related important issues.

24

172

S2

Poster

no

 

93

284

S2

Poster

no

 

121

330

S2

Poster

no

 

69

249

S2

Poster

no

 

78

314

S2

Poster

no

 

92

188

s2

Poster

no

 

156

356

S2

Poster

no

 

157

15

S2

Poster

no

fancy title-but seems like a social survey-not sure whether a social survey will be allowed

39

45

S3

Poster

minor corrections required

the abstract format is different

32

22

S3

Poster

no

 

31

115

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

40

123

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

43

119

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

55

121

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

59

117

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

99

125

S3

Poster

no

asked for Poster only

56

261

S3

Poster

No

 

76

291

S3

Poster

no

 

84

292

S3

Poster

no

 

3

75

S4

Poster

no

too many abbreviations-these need to explained

82

323

S4

Poster

no

Special character(s) should be taken care of.

38

76

S4

Poster

no

 

44

155

S4

Poster

no

the abstract format is different

45

161

S4

Poster

no

the abstract format is different

52

238

S4

Poster

No

 

53

109

S4

Poster

No

 

61

258

S4

Poster

No

Word count: 361. Title needs to be edited: Type II Diabetes mellitus

67

98

S4

Poster

No

 

159

191

S4

Poster

no

abstract could be written more clearly

34

52

S4

Poster

no

minor corrections required

49

278

S4

Poster

no

minor corrections required

26

151

S4

Poster

no

Minor spelling mistakes are corected

27

218

S4

WITHDRAWN

no

Minor spelling mistakes are corected

51

184

S4

Poster

No

A questionnaire based study, conducted among patients

54

245

S4

Poster

No

 

64

187

S4

Poster

No

 

70

308

S4

Poster

no

Only zinc level was measured only in 40 patients, levels of zinc according to the grades of squamous cell carcinoma would have been more interesting which is missing. It is completely discretion of the convenor of SC whether it should be accepted even only for publication.

100

293

S4

Poster

YES

some sentences and findings are not clear. Need to clear it from author

103

207

S4

Poster

no

survey of a particular diorder, not realy relevant with biotechnology or molecular biol works

104

300

S4

Poster

no

 

108

49

S4

Poster

no

Minor correction

111

268

S4

Poster

NO

instructions for  writing abstract not followed, minor track change is necessary

110

92

S4

Poster

NO

 

154

329

S4

Poster

no

 

155

82

S4

Poster

no

 

112

331

S4

Poster

no

research ongoing

119

36

S4

Poster

yes

Need to rewrite the text

132

348

S4

Poster

no

 

153

251

S4

Poster

No

 

88

273

S4

Poster

no

 

152

84

S5

Poster

no

 

79

167

S5

Poster

yes

Authors aimed to identify mutation frequency of different genes however, I did not find the number of samples. Did they sequence the whole gene? Exon numbers of respective genes were not mentioned.

41

129

S6

Poster

corrections required

title should begin with something like "A study of---"

63

63

S6

Poster

No

 

71

283

S6

Poster

no

 

81

270

S6

Poster

no

 

86

325

S6

Poster

no

 not directly relevant to Biotech/molecular biology work

141

341

S6

Poster

No

 

149

302

S6

Poster

major revision

Abstract not clear. Authors talk about antibacterial activity of green tea and then go on to find bacterial contamination of green tea itself?

16

111

S6

Poster

no

 

17

28

S6

Poster

no

 

98

43

S7

Poster

no

 

73

320

S7

Poster

no

 

95

336

S7

Poster

no

 

109

322

S7

Poster

no

 

136

294

S7

Poster

no

 

137

306

S7

Poster

no

 

4

74

S7

Poster

no

 

13

103

S7

Poster

no

 

96

337

S7

Poster

no

 

97

340

S7

Poster

no

 

101

334

S7

Poster

no

 

102

339

S7

Poster

no

 

115

344

S7

Poster

no

 

116

345

S7

Poster

no

 

117

346

S7

Poster

no

 

121

338

S7

Poster

no

 

125

347

S7

Poster

no

 

127

313

S7

Poster

no

 

129

310

S7

Poster

no

 

130

298

S7

Poster

no

 

131

186

S7

Poster

no

 

140

305

S7

Poster

no

 

144

208

S7

Poster

no

 

161

354

S7

Poster

no

 

126

299

S7

Poster

no

 

94

211

s6

Publication only (no presentation)

no

no dry or wt lab experiments found

113

342

S1

Publication only (no presentation)

no

Review in general

74

253

S1

Publication only (no presentation)

no

idea based abstract

143

351

S4

Publication only (no presentation)

no

Not clear if any work was done at all.

151

343

S1

Publication only (no presentation)

no

Hypothesis only-does not even make any sense

124

352

S5

WITHDRAWN

no

Review in general

138

353

S4

WITHDRAWN

no

 

65

275

S1

WITHDRAWN

no

no report on findings